Cases 41 - 50 of 523
EEON Foundation v. Google Inc. et al
as 3:2020mc80046
Respondent:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
EEON Foundation
Melton v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Straight Talk, Best Buy, Marysville Waste Management and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ou-Young v. Haag et al
as 5:2020mc80010
Defendant:
Google Inc., Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Ou-Young v. Grewal et al
as 5:2020mc80003
Defendant:
Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf, Taiwan, Republic of China and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
John Demos, Jr. v. Google, Inc., et al
as 19-17541
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNOCO, APPLE, INC., AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Paul Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 19-17542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH SAYRE, Owner of Rdevice
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC.
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Frederick Banks v. Lisa Bloom et al
as 2:2019cv08514
Respondent:
Brett Cavenaugh, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. House and Representatives and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Google Inc.
as 3:2019cv04319
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ceaser Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thugtorious Gs Activechuckss v. Amazon.com et al
as 2:2019cv04429
Defendant:
Gyfcat, Amazon.com, Google Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thrgtorious Gs Activechuckss and Thugtorious Gs Activechuckss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
