Cases 41 - 50 of 298
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04984
Plaintiff:
April Burch, Tarrah Ciarimboli, Alfred Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Torres-Penaloza v. Garland
as 22-777
Petitioner:
GABINA TORRES-PENALOZA, ANA IRIS FIERRO-TORRES and MAURO FIERRO-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Leonardo Lopez et al
as 2:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Leonardo Lopez, Iris Lopez, Fernando Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kenneth Urquidi et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Urquidi, Sr, Iris Urquidi, Kaydee Urquidi and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Creager et al v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2021cv02101
Plaintiff:
Justin Creager, Amanda Maddeaux, Iris Corbert and others
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
