Cases 41 - 50 of 67
iTEK Services Inc v. Technical Services and Logistics Inc et al
as 8:2012cv01592
Defendant:
Jeffrey J Collins, Deploynet Inc, Ronald Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
iTEK Services Inc
Michael Collins v. State of Washington, et al
as 12-35244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, State of Washington and DAVID A. IVERSON
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Elizabeth C. Knight et al
as 2:2012cv02546
Defendant:
Margaret J. Collins-Smith, Does and Elizabeth C. Knight
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Armstrong et al v. Merced County et al
as 1:2011cv01632
Plaintiff:
Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong
Defendant:
Merced County, Mark Pazin, James Buttrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong et al v. Merced County et al
as 1:2011at00612
Plaintiff:
Martha Armstrong and Kered Armstrong
Defendant:
Merced County, Mark Pazin, James Buttrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2011cv05594
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries and David A Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LSREF2 CLIPPER III, LLC v. Collins
as 6:2011cv06163
Defendant:
Linda J. Collins
Plaintiff:
LSREF2 CLIPPER III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ROBERT J. COLLINS V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:1998cv00114
Petitioner:
Robert J. Collins
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strawn v. Shenandoah Charters et al
as 1:2010cv04015
Plaintiff:
Nicole Strawn
Defendant:
Shenandoah Charters, Clay Collins, Todd J. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
