Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Robinson v. Brooks
as 2:2011cv01666
Defendant:
Bill Brooks
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Robinson v. Theresa Banks
as 2:2011cv06133
Respondent:
Theresa Banks
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Robinson v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2011cv01209
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson VS. USA
as 2:2011cv00482
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
James Robinson v. USA
as 2:2011cv00919
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. James Robinson
as 11-10142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ROBINSON
Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:1994cv00671
Plaintiff:
Vincent Cervantes , Steven G Williams , Alfred Yancy and others
Defendant:
Michael Connolly , Marisela Montes , James W Nielsen and others
Amicu:
California Attorneys for Criminal Justice , San Diego Criminal Defense Bar Association and Criminal Defense Lawyers Club of San Diego
Pecial_master:
Chase Riveland, Virginia Morrison and Nancy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. C.N.F.
as 3:2009cv02642
Petitioner:
Brette James Robinson
Respondent:
C.N.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Brooks et al
as 2:2009cv00831
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Bill Brooks and Don Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Murry et al
as 2:2009cv00818
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Anthony Murry, Noelle Halaby, Will Mattly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
