Cases 41 - 50 of 880
Sophia Olsson v. PLDT Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sophia Olsson
Defendant:
PLDT Inc., Manuel V. Pangilinan, Alfred S. Panlilio and others
Thomas BakerIn re: Thomas Baker
as 23-80005
Respondent:
In re: THOMAS M. BAKER, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 12,1996
Freeman v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
June Freeman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ji et al v. Naver Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv05143
Defendant:
LINE Euro-Americas Corporation, LINE Plus Corporation, Naver Cloud Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Bonner, Kira Tomlinson, Sydney Ji and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garavanian et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 4:2022cv06841
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Garavanian, Katherine R. Arcell, Jose M. Brito and others
Defendant:
Gary Talewsky, Jet Blue Airways Corporation, Spirit Airlines Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Graham v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
June Graham
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
June L Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brian MoquinIn re: Brian Moquin
as 22-80124
Respondent:
In re: BRIAN P. MOQUIN, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 11, 2014
e&Co. AG v. Zync Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05098
Plaintiff:
e&Co. AG
Defendant:
Zync Inc. and Rana June Sobhany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
