Cases 41 - 50 of 111
(HC) Lundie v. Bird
as 2:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
Herrick Lundie
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Threlkeld v. McKay et al
as 1:2022at00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Threlkeld
Defendant:
Sharon McKay and L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Threlkeld v. McKay et al
as 1:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Threlkeld
Defendant:
Sharon McKay and L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezekiel Ansah et al v. Regime PPE et al
as 2:2021cv08829
Plaintiff:
Ezekial Ansah, K & Z Trading, LLC and K and Z Trading, LLC
Defendant:
Regime PPE, Blue Avian Ventures LLC, Books4Blondes Inc. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Joann Selleck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lundy v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv09289
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LUNDY
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lundy v. JUUL Labs, Inc. d/b/a as PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv07162
Defendant:
Eby-Brown Company, LLC, James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lundy et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 3:2020cv05282
Plaintiff:
Stacy McDaniel, Mose Edward Green, Jr., Vernita M. Simpson and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Dixon v. Lizarraga et al
as 1:2019cv01326
Defendant:
S. Palomares, K. Staley, L. Lundy and others
Plaintiff:
Delmar Jewell Dixon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Dixon v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2019cv01966
Defendant:
S. Palomares, K. Staley, L. Lundy and others
Plaintiff:
Delmar Jewell Dixon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
