Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Coleman v. Hennessey et al
as 3:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Roderick Coleman
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey, Tilton, Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Seaver et al
as 3:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marion C. Starks
Defendant:
Seaver and Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2010cv00062
Petitioner:
Marion Cedric Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2009cv06073
Petitioner:
Marion Cedric Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colley v. Recot et al
as 3:2009cv06005
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Colley
Defendant:
P. Recot, Miamoto, Jail Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Haskell et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2009cv04779
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Elizabeth Aida Haskell and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eva Steinberger and Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pizzo v. Newsom et al
as 3:2009cv04493
Plaintiff:
Therese Marie Pizzo and Therese Marie Pizzo
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pizzo v. Newsom et al
as 4:2009cv04493
Plaintiff:
Therese Marie Pizzo and Therese Marie Pizzo
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Heather Fong, George Gascon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Felix v. Hennessey
as 3:2001cv03138
Petitioner:
Scott Emerson Felix
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
