Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00447
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
France v. Eyster
as 3:2019cv06141
Defendant:
Charles David Eyster
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray France
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
France v. Lunceford et al
as 3:2019cv03934
Defendant:
Charles David Eyster, City of Ukiah, Ross Lunceford and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray France
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ray Tarbet v. FCA US LLC, et al
as 2:2019cv02997
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Tarbet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15536
Defendant:
VAN DER NOORD, KIRKOFF, HUDSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HORN, Lieutenant, MOONEY, Deputy Warden, COCA, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Michael Lynam v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15831
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY LYNAM
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Heavy Rotation LLC v. Tyga Touring, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05504
Defendant:
Michael Ray Stevenson and Tyga Touring, LLC
Plaintiff:
Heavy Rotation LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Stacie Feldman Hausner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00201
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swanson v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv02148
Defendant:
ATSDR, United States, VA Oregon Regional Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
France et al v. Dewey et al
as 3:2018cv05659
Defendant:
Officer Marsh, Parole Officer D Weathers, Sgt Hoyle and others
Plaintiff:
Carley Schlapkohl, Jamie Thompson and Michael Ray France
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
