Cases 41 - 50 of 1,741
Moore v. Henderson, et al.
as 24-983
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J MOORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L HENDERSON, MD, TIMOTHY G CAUDILL, MD, SIR REYES, PA and others
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, N.P.M. Davies, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Kinsey, et al.
as 24-709
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
KATHERINE KINSEY, TARA MULAY, JEAN M. COSTANZA and others
Reed v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Reed
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Doctor HDSP, Nurse Practitioner HDSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Welsh et al
as 4:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Joshua Robertson
Defendant:
Hannah Welsh, Epham Tiku, Gladys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 24-435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LURA MERITT, Nurse Practitioner, STAF B-Fac., CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY AND STATE PRISON AT CORCORAN, MONICA FISHBURN and others
Dufrisne v. Klem et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Paul Dufrisne
Defendant:
Kimberly Klem, Supivisor Alma, Nurse Alma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Mission Inn et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Mission Inn, Mission Motel, Rochester Zen Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dynamic Nursing Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Dynamic Nursing Services, Inc. and Dynamic Home Care Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
