Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Powell's Books, Inc., et al v. John Kroeger, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35153
Plaintiff - Appellant: POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al Featured Case
as 09-35154
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff: POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Cross, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 08-36069
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., CARL OFFENBACHER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DUANE CROSS, BUD KAUFMAN, GARY WIRTH and others
Defendant - Appellee: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 08-36058
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant - Appellant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant: DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Rogue Advocates, et al
as 08-36033
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Schmidt v. Polk County Jail et al
as 3:2008cv00733
Plaintiff: Timothy Ryan Schmidt
Defendant: Polk County Jail and Don Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Little et al
as 3:2008cv00612
Plaintiff: John C. Molina
Defendant: Rob Little, Marty Silbernagel, Bob Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Holsapple et al
as 6:2008cv06037
Plaintiff: Lance E. Briggs
Defendant: Michael Holsapple and Polk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briggs v. Holsapple et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv06037
Plaintiff: Lance E. Briggs
Defendant: Michael Holsapple and Polk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson et al v. City of Salem et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00226
Plaintiff: Troy Hudson, Sr., Troy Hudson, Sr., Autumn Hudson and others
Defendant: City of Salem, City of Salem, Polk County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?