Cases 41 - 50 of 614
Stanford Bryant v. J. Ochoa, et al
as 11-55153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANFORD PAUL BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TIM OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, STUART J. RYAN, Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden, in his/her official capacity and as an individual and others
Williams v. Baca et al
as 2:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Williams
Defendant:
Leroy D Baca, County of Los Angeles, Jonathan Pera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patkins v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2010cv03440
Plaintiff:
David C. Patkins
Defendant:
R. Gonzales, C. Barroga, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalo Gonzales v. R. Subia
as 10-17407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GONZALO R. GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
R. J. SUBIA
Arutyun Demirchyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales
as 2:2008cv03452
Petitioner:
Arutyun Demirchyan
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brian Hubbard, et al v. Jay Brown, et al
as 10-35556
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUBBARD, IRMA COOPER, JENNIFER HUBBARD and others
Appellant:
PASTOR NELL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY BROWN, X Indited Sheriff Parker County Texas, COY CARTER, X Sheriff Parker County Texas, THOMAS A. CARTER, Green Oaks and TSP and Mercinary and others
Jewel et al v. National Security Agency et al
as 3:2008cv04373
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jewel, Carolyn Jewel, Carolyn Jewel and others
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Keith B. Alexander, Michael V. Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalo Gonzales v. R. Subia
as 10-15697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GONZALO R. GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
R. J. SUBIA
Virginia Shubert, et al v. George Bush, et al
as 10-15638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGINIA SHUBERT, NOHA ARAFA, SARAH DRANOFF and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN, KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
