Cases 51 - 60 of 292
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guy Scott Griffithe et al
as 8:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Sonja Marie Russell, Guy Scott Griffithe, SMRB, LLC and others
(PC) Jackson v. Griffith
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Lyle D. Griffith
Plaintiff:
Fred Jay Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan VanLoan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Samuel Lee, Steve Soboroff, Gleam Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanLoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rukhsana Mir et al v. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Scott Mathews, Leo Oorts, Thomas M. Fallo and others
Plaintiff:
Jehan Zeb Mir, MD, Rukhsana Mir and Jehan Zeb Mir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) Leonard v. Zuniga et al
as 2:2019cv02594
Defendant:
Griffith, Williams and Zuniga
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Care Ambulance Service, Inc. et al v. Scott Griffith Collaborative Solutions, LLC
as 4:2019cv08171
Plaintiff:
Care Ambulance Service, Inc., Falck Northern California Corp., Falck USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Scott Griffith Collaborative Solutions, LLC and Scott Griffith Collaborative Solutions, LLC doing business as SG Collaborative Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tonja Demoff et al v. NefertitiLong et al
as 2:2019cv10437
Defendant:
Mario Contreras, La Place Group, LLC, California TD Specialists and others
Plaintiff:
Virtual Consulting Group, LLC and Tonja Demoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Granderson v. Griffith
as 2:2019cv02212
Defendant:
Griffith
Plaintiff:
David Earl Granderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 3:2019cv06546
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Griffith A Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
