Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Smith v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al
as 1:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Nita Smith
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America , St. Paul Travelers , Phoenix Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saldana v. Borem et al
as 3:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Saldana
Defendant:
T Borem, John Doe I, R Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Townsend v. C Munden, et al
as 11-35232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE E TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee:
C MUNDEN, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, D. THOMPSON and others
Ricky Louis Alford v. Steven Cooley et al
as 2:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
Rickey L Alford
Defendant:
Steven Cooley, Dep DA, Jane Doe I and others
Carlos Anthony Miranda v. Lowbonski et al
as 2:2011cv00162
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Anthony Miranda
Manuel Lopez v. Chief of Police John Doe et al
as 2:2011cv00055
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer, Chief Medical Officer, Chief of Police John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lopez
Alford v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv05007
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford
Defendant:
John Doe, I and John Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe I, et al v. Nestle, USA, et al
as 10-56739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE I, individually and on behalf of proposed class members, JOHN DOE II, individually and on behalf of proposed class members, JOHN DOE III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NESTLE, S.A., NESTLE USA, INC., NESTLE IVORY COAST and others
Feeley v. Minkoff et al
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Vincent Feeley
Defendant:
Randy Minkoff, J.R. Chapman, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Driggers v. Louis Winn, et al
as 10-16817
Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS WINN, Warden and UNKOWN PARTIES, John Doe I, John Doe II, Unknown Employees of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
