Cases 51 - 60 of 94
USA v. Rupert Evan
as 12-50479
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUPERT HENRY EVANS, AKA Roger
Dwayne Orange et al v. Wachovia Bank NA et al
as 5:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Cummesky, John M Cummesky, Christopher D'Silva and others
Defendant:
Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation, Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Republic Mortgage Insurance Company and others
USA v. James Demmon
as 12-50434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DEMMONS, AKA James Anderson, AKA Craig, AKA James Demmond, AKA Rupert Demmons, AKA James Hughes, AKA James David Hughes, AKA James Paul Rubert, AKA James David Summers, AKA Van Demmons, AKA Van Dillion, AKA James Van Huges, AKA Van Wright, AKA Craig
Greene v. Vasquez et al
as 2:2012cv02351
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Alexander Greene
Defendant:
L Vasquez, Gutiene, J Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2012cv01568
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Alexander Greene
Defendant:
L Vasquez, Gutiene, J Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyce Hicks v. Nevada Dept of Corrections, et al
as 12-16517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES COX, Director of N.D.O.C., SHERYL FOSTER, Assistant Director of N.D.O.C. and others
John Schoppe-Rico v. J. Rupert, et al
as 12-16225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. SCHOPPE-RICO
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. RUPERT, Procurement and Service Officer II, J. VAN VALKENBERG, Correctional Business Manager I, C. WILLIAMS, Supervisor and others
Hicks v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00666
Defendant:
James Cox, Sheryl Foster, J. Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rupert v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Wade G Rupert
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
