Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Anthony, et al v. Benefield et al
as 2:2010cv00689
Defendant:
Jonothan Benefield, Julie Benefield and Walnut Hill Estate Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angela Anthony , John Anthony , Joseph Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bernard Steppe v. Attorney General
as 5:2010cv00173
Respondent:
Attorney General
Petitioner:
Bernard Steppe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02940
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Steppe v. Attorney General California
as 2:2009cv03452
Petitioner:
Bernard Steppe
Respondent:
Attorney General California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bernard Steppe v. San Bernardino County Sheriff
as 5:2009cv01816
Petitioner:
Bernard Steppe
Respondent:
San Bernardino County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brewis v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jorey Lee Brewis
Defendant:
Max Williams, Mitch Morrow, Steve Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 6:2009cv06235
Plaintiff:
John A. Brown
Defendant:
Max Williams, Robert Carrillo, M. London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Noll et al
as 5:2009cv03840
Plaintiff:
James Lucius Oliver
Defendant:
C. Noll, G. Neotti, T. Variz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faurot v. Stepp Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michele C. Faurot
Defendant:
Stepp Brothers, Inc., Kendall Land Rover LLC and Land Rover North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bernard Steppe v. California Insurance Commissio
as 09-16267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD ALBERT STEPPE
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
