Cases 51 - 60 of 83,531
United States of America v. Brosnan
as 24-3644
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN BROSNAN
United States of America v. Lopez-Chaidez
as 24-3614
Defendant:
JOSE LORENZO LOPEZ-CHAIDEZ and Jorge Lorenzo Lopez-Chaidez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schmidt v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-3617
Petitioner:
KORIE SCHMIDT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Chinook Indian Nation, et al. v. Haaland, et al.
as 24-3629
Plaintiff:
CHINOOK INDIAN NATION, an Indian Tribe and a Washington non-profit corporation, and as successor-in-interest to The Lower Band of Chinook Indians, ANTHONY A. JOHNSON, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the Chinook Indian Nation and CONFEDERATED LOWER CHINOOK TRIBES AND BANDS
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT and others
Combs v. United States Government
as 24-3616
Petitioner:
PATRICK DAVY COMBS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
United States of America v. Jayavarman
as 24-3631
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JASON JAYAVARMAN
United States of America v. Banks
as 24-3643
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ELISHAY BANKS
United States of America v. Goodman
as 24-3632
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MATTHEW RYAN GOODMAN
Scionti v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Eric Thomas Scionti
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
