Cases 51 - 60 of 80,821
DK Fab Inc v Shinn & Son Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
DK Fab Inc
Defendant:
Shinn & Son Inc and Satus Creek Farms LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fletcher v. Redman et al
as 3:2024cv05216
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Jennifer Redman, Yvonne Umu and Shawn Northcut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savannah Intellectual Property LLC v. Holt Group Inc
as 3:2024cv05215
Plaintiff:
Savannah Intellectual Property LLC
Defendant:
Holt Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugh v. Devos et al
as 3:2024cv05376
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant:
Keith Devos, Tabitha Yockey, Shawn Candella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leighty v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Leighty
Defendant:
Spokane County, Sheriff John Nowels and Spokane County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coenmans v. Bakon Bakkerijmachines USA Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
FRANK COENMANS
Defendant:
LUC IMBREHECHTS and BAKON BAKKERIJ MACHINES, USA INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
A.A. et al v. Secret Harbor
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
A.A., M.T. and J.Y.
Defendant:
Secret Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ziegler v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
