Cases 61 - 70 of 14,952
Yausmenda Freeman v. Joey Anthony Duran
as 2:2024cv03964
Plaintiff:
Yausmenda Freeman
Defendant:
Joey Anthony Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
as 3:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Anthony Rico Turmer
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Medina v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2024cv02921
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and SGT. Robert M Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caprera v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Anthony Caprera
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
