Cases 61 - 70 of 2,302
Alvarez v. Newsome
as 4:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant:
V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Fields v. Foss, et al.
as 24-2377
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE SHAWN DUPREE FIELDS
Defendant:
C. CALDERON, S. ALVAREZ, D. MAGANA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Mann v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Bass, Unknown Barundo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Gonzalez Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-2329
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO GONZALEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Deshone M. Lacey Jr. v. M. Felts et al
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
