Cases 61 - 70 of 33,604
Duran v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2024cv01625
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
David B. Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01627
Defendant:
B. Gomez, C. Chadry, P. Wingo and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cisneros v. Rowland, et al.
as 1:2024cv01070
Defendant:
B. Brown, Jim Garcia, D. Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casity v. Amador County
as 2:2024cv02449
Defendant:
B. Wheeler, Amador County, Renee C. Day and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Casity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07652
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Buehler v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05759
Plaintiff:
Donna Buehler
Defendant:
The Bank New York Mellon F/K/A The Bank of New York as Trustee for Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-FRE1, Quality Loan Servicing Corp. of Washington and Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv06323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01418
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv06322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Major v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv06291
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
