Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Joseph Antonetti v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 13-16137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ISIDRO BACH, JAMES HENSEN and others
Valerie Withrow v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shield, In
as 13-55812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALERIE J. WITHROW, FKA Valerie J. Hunt
Defendant - Appellee:
BACHE HALSEY STUART SHIELD, INC. SALARY PROTECTION PLAN (LTD)
Bach v. Kaiser Permanente
as 3:2013cv00743
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest and Kaiser Permanente
Plaintiff:
Linda Bach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vinh Bach v. American Red Cross et al
as 8:2013cv00069
Defendant:
American Red Cross, Corinthian Colleges and Does
Plaintiff:
Vinh Bach
Matthew Peck v. Nelson Bach USA Ltd et al
as 5:2012cv01589
Defendant:
Does and Nelson Bach USA Ltd
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peck
Jeremy Bach v. Charles Ryan
as 12-17058
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL BACH
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Robert Bach et al
as 2:2012cv06518
Defendant:
Robert Bach and Does
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
Perine et al v. Bache
as 4:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Georgia Perine and Ryen Galbraith
Defendant:
Walter Bache
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2012cv00391
Respondent:
Daphne Bach, Oregon Board of Parole/Post-Prison Supervision, State of Oregon and others
Petitioner:
Bradley Christopher Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pacific Life & Annuity Services, Inc. et al v. Employers Compensation Insurance Company - Glendale et al
as 3:2011cv02806
Plaintiff:
Pacific Life & Annuity Services, Inc. and Pacific Life and Annuity Company
Defendant:
Employers Compensation Insurance Company - Glendale, United States Attorney General , Elizabeth Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
