Cases 61 - 70 of 102
USA v. Cliven Bundy, et al
as 17-10000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CLIVEN D. BUNDY, RYAN BUNDY, AMMON BUNDY and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
BATTLE BORN MEDIA, LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL and ASSOCIATED PRESS
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 16-16873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Medenbach et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv01617
Defendant:
Brown, Anna J. Brown, Craig Gabriel and others
Plaintiff:
Medenbach, Kenneth Medenbach, Ammon Bundy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Ammon Bundy
as 16-30179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY
USA v. Ammon Bundy
as 16-30179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY
Cliven Bundy v. USDC-NVL
as 16-72275
:
In re: CLIVEN D. BUNDY
Petitioner:
CLIVEN D. BUNDY, AKA Cliven Bundy
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bundy v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv01047
Plaintiff:
Cliven Bundy
Defendant:
Gloria Navarro, Barack Obama, Kristen Orthman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Ammon Bundy, et al
as 16-30080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY, RYAN PAYNE, BRIAN CAVALIER and others
Wilson v. Fox et al.
as 2:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Robert W Fox, Brian Duffy, D. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundy v. Malnove Incorporated of Utah et al
as 3:2015cv03899
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bundy
Defendant:
Malnove Incorporated of Utah and Malnove Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
