Cases 61 - 70 of 944
(PC) Valdez v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodney Valdez
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, K. Hixon, B. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert ChapmanIn re: Robert Chapman
as 23-80003
Respondent:
In re: ROBERT E. CHAPMAN, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: October 10, 1991
Freeman et al v. 3Commas Technologies OU
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman, Tigran Melkonyan, Ari Shofet and others
Defendant:
3Commas Technologies OU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(PC) Holston v. Massetti et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Theron Holston and Theron Kenneth Holston
Defendant:
Debbie Massetti, Moore, Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Gregory Downs v. A. Chapman et al
as 2:2022cv08795
Plaintiff:
Gregory Downs
Defendant:
A. Chapman, Dr Kadada, Dr. Joffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. United States Forest Service
as 1:2022cv01531
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chapman
Defendant:
United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Levi v. Chapman et al
as 6:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Ethan Levi
Defendant:
Kim Chapman, Anastasia Tibbetts, Kassidy O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
