Cases 61 - 70 of 122
USA v. Robert Prudholme, Jr.
as 16-50295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT PRUDHOLME, Jr., AKA RJ
Quintero v. Holstedt et al
as 6:2016cv01047
Defendant:
Walter M. Beglau, Judge Linda L. Bergman, Chief Judge Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Quintero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
as 3:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
Carlton Fields
Defendant:
RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres Romo v. RJ Donovan Warden et al
as 8:2016cv00525
Respondent:
Paramo and RJ Donovan Warden
Petitioner:
Andres Romo
Kane v. RJ Donovan State Prison
as 3:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elias Kane
Defendant:
RJ Donovan State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pension Plan for Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers et al v. RJ Miles, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05595
Plaintiff:
Pension Plan for Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers , Richard Piombo and Russell E. Burns
Defendant:
RJ Miles, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06140
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06088
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Andres v. Marshall, et al
as 15-56057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LAMARR ANDRES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL, Correctional Officer at RJ Donovan, R. OLSON, CCII Appeals Coordinator, J. RAMIREZ, CCII Appeals Coordinator and others
Kevin Andres v. Marshall, et al
as 15-56057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN LAMARR ANDRES
Defendant / Appellee:
MARSHALL, Correctional Officer at RJ Donovan, R. OLSON, CCII Appeals Coordinator, J. RAMIREZ, CCII Appeals Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
