Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. Barnes
as 3:2015cv01260
Petitioner:
Earnest S. Harris
Respondent:
R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. Barnes et al
as 4:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Earnest S. Harris
Defendant:
R. Barnes, Herman, Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Harris v. R. Lewis, et al
as 14-16660
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARNEST S. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
R. LEWIS, Warden and GREG LEWIS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-56211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03956
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Earnest Harris v. Ron Barne
as 13-73882
Petitioner:
EARNEST S. HARRIS
Respondent:
RON E. BARNES, Warden
Toyota Motor Corporation
as 13-56505
:
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KARINA BRAZDYS, JOHN MOSCICKI, DALE BALDISSERI and others
Objector - Appellant:
ANGELA C. BOLES, WAYNE S. HARRIS and JULIE RAINWATER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, a Japanese Corporation / a foreign corporation, 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota, Aichi 471-8571, Japan, DBA Toyota Motor North America, Inc., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Kentucky corporation, FKA Toyota Motor Manutacturing North America, Inc., FKA Toyota Technical Center, U.S.A., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation / a foreign corporation, 19001 South Western Avenue, Torrance, California 90501 and others
Harris v. Lewis
as 3:2013cv01788
Petitioner:
Earnest S. Harris
Respondent:
R. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
