Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Socorro v. State of California et al
as 2:2007cv01313
Plaintiff:
Roberto Socorro
Defendant:
State of California, D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01058
Plaintiff:
Willie Sheffield
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, Tan, Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01050
Plaintiff:
James Earl Weaver
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto and A. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Sisto et al
as 3:2007cv00944
Plaintiff:
Willie Sheffield
Defendant:
D K Sisto, Tan, ., Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv00934
Plaintiff:
Andrew Calvin Coley
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, Tan, Casin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Sisto et al
as 3:2007cv02243
Plaintiff:
James E. Weaver
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto and A. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Carey, et al
as 2:2007cv00718
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Mendez Cato
Defendant:
Thomas L. Carey, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro C. Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. California State Prison Solano et al
as 2:2007cv00431
Plaintiff:
David Ray Williams
Defendant:
California State Prison Solano, Martin, Naku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. California State Prison Solano et al
as 2:2007cv00432
Plaintiff:
David Ray Williams
Defendant:
Rohere, Daniel Thor, Rebecca Trachenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duran v. State of California et al
as 2:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
Miguel Duran
Defendant:
State of California, D. K. Sisto, T. C. Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
