Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Easley v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05703
Plaintiff:
Jasun T. Easley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Grady, et al v. Jonathan Levin, et al
as 14-16457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRADY and JENNIFER GRADY
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN LEVIN, SARAH LEVIN, MICHAEL E. BENBEN and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
TRI-CITY NATIONAL BANK, a national bank
Intervenor-Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Bank of Elmwood, a Wisconsin corporation
Mark Easley v. Jim MacDonald
as 14-55546
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RAYMOND EASLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM MACDONALD and MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Tony French v. Snake River Correctional Insti, et al
as 14-35112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DARRIN EASLEY, #4241, MARK NOOTH and others
Michael Easley et al v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00117
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Sergio Diaz, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Easley and Stephania Session
Robert Woodroffe v. John Kitzhaber, et al
as 13-35986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. KITZHABER, JOHN R. KROGER, BRENDA COUGHENHOWER and others
Easley v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01637
Plaintiff:
Jacob Easley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gary Easley v. County of San Benito, et al
as 13-16327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN BENITO, SAN BENITO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, RAMON MENDOZA and others
Gary Easley v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 13-16277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, SANTA CLARA SHERIFF DEPT., GERHARD WALLACE, Deputy and others
Easley v. State Attorney General
as 2:2013cv01106
Petitioner:
Gary D. Easley
Respondent:
State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
