Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Thornes et al v. IBM Lender Business Process Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01716
Plaintiff:
Michael J Thornes and Jill D Thornes
Defendant:
IBM Lender Business Process Services Inc and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
White v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2010cv02199
Plaintiff:
Todd R White
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, IBM Lender Business Process Services Incorporated, TD Service Company of Arizona Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Donald G. Nott v. IBM Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv07450
Defendant:
Does and IBM Corporation
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Nott
Baum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv04280
Plaintiff:
Nancy Baum
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and IBM Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Prichard v. Metroplitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv03313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Prichard
Defendant:
Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and The IBM Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Prichard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv03313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Prichard
Defendant:
Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and The IBM Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ
as 2:2010mj01837
Defendant:
One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ
as 2:2010mj01837
Defendant:
One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00522
Defendant:
San Diego County, William V. Gallo, Dana M. Sabraw and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IBM LAPTOP WITH SERIAL NUMBER 99-TFFB6
as 2:2010mj00011
Defendant:
IBM LAPTOP WITH SERIAL NUMBER 99-TFFB6 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
