Cases 71 - 80 of 147
Miller v. Seterus, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02081
Plaintiff:
Rita Miller
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dow v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2016cv05812
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Dow
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Timothy J Mayopoulous, PRLAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Thorpe v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thorpe
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irma J. Grant v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06692
Defendant:
Does, Federal National Mortgage Association and Seterus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Irma J. Grant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gerald Carey Garwood v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2016cv01749
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Does, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Carey Garwood
Hendren v. Seterus, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01661
Plaintiff:
Darren Hendren
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Michael A Setka et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv05861
Defendant:
Does, Federal National Mortgage Association, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M Setka and Michael A Setka
In re: Zoya Kosovska, et al v. Max Default Services Corp., et al
as 16-60060
Debtor:
In re: ZOYA KOSOVSKA and LILIYA WALSH
Appellant:
ZOYA KOSOVSKA and LILIYA WALSH
Appellee:
MAX DEFAULT SERVICES CORPORATION, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and SETERUS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
