Cases 71 - 80 of 104
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. JB Collision Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01946
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
JB Collision Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv08207
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Glen F Everett and Lisa L Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Charles Richard Barnes v. Core Distribution Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05893
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Barnes
Defendant:
Core Distribution Inc, Does and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Performance Auto Body Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00428
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Heritage Collision Center Inc, Performance Auto Body Inc and others
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Earl Scheib of California, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02646
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Earl Scheib of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deleon et al v. AC And S, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05447
Plaintiff:
Evangelina Deleon , Maria Elena Saavedra , Sandy Ramirez and others
Defendant:
AC And S, Inc., 84 Lumber Company, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02761
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. and Kirk Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
