Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Franklin v. Brunson et al
as 3:2007cv05537
Plaintiff: Scott Franklin
Defendant: Karen Brunson, Grubb, Julie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Brunson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv05391
Petitioner: Michael Christopher Hale
Respondent: Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bianchi v. Brunson
as 3:2007cv05329
Petitioner: Ronald Jay Bianchi
Respondent: Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stenger v. Brunson
as 2:2007cv05026
Petitioner: Russell Francis Stenger
Respondent: Karen D Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allah v. Brunson
as 2:2007cv00760
Petitioner: Allah
Respondent: Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Brunson
as 2:2007cv00635
Petitioner: John Phillip Anderson
Respondent: Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Pfizer, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv01280
Plaintiff: Brenda Brunson
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Enquist v. Clarke et al
as 3:2007cv05069
Plaintiff: J D Enquist
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Richard Morgan and Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enquist v. Clarke et al
as 3:2007cv05073
Plaintiff: J D Enquist
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Richard Morgan and Karen Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Luly et al
as 4:2007cv00012
Plaintiff: Edward L. Brunson, Jr.
Defendant: Scott Luly, James McDonald and Theresa Schnee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?