Cases 81 - 90 of 1,123
Bello v. Noyola
as 2:2023cv00827
Plaintiff:
David Bello
Defendant:
Claudia Noyola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lisamarie Rayzberg v. County Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv02585
Plaintiff:
Lisamarie Rayzberg
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Claudia Saucedo, Scott Reynal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soto v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Claudia Vega Soto
Respondent:
Warden Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Newport Bluffs LLC v. William Elliott et al
as 8:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Newport Bluffs LLC
Defendant:
William Elliott, Claudia Agudelo and Does 1 to 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
