Cases 81 - 90 of 423
Pittman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03965
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irwin v. Davison et al
as 2:2018cv03409
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Mesa Police Department, Tanner Davison and others
Plaintiff:
Sasha Douglas Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Pittman v. Kamen et al
as 1:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kamen, S. Gates and Donald B. McElroy
Plaintiff:
Edward Simeon Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novick et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2018cv05016
Plaintiff:
Albert Poniedzialek, Diane Rhone, Denise Twiford and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 53,300.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2018cv05874
Defendant:
$53,300.00 in U.S. Currency and 53,300.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Pittman Oczavia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Michael Harkey v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al
as 18-16011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HARKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, U.S. BANK, CSMC MORTGAGE BACKED TRUST 2007-6 and others
Randall Pittman, et al v. Vita-Mix Corporation, et al
as 18-55269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAINOLDO GOODING and NADEEN GOODING, as individuals, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
RANDALL PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VITA-MIX CORPORATION, DBA Vitamix and KELLY SERVICES, INC.
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
