Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55970
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Dean Himbler Aviles v. George Chapman et al
as 2:2018cv04260
Defendant: Lynd Jason Allen, AFSANEH Tabaddor Ashley, George Chapman and others
Plaintiff: Dean Himbler Aviles
Fi-Shai Soong v. Mario Correa et al
as 5:2018cv00923
Defendant: Annie Correa, Mario Correa and Does
Plaintiff: Fi-Shai Soong
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00019
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
In Re Allen B. Shay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00023
In Re Debtor: Allen B. Shay
Appellant: Allen B. Shay
Appellee: Alfred H. Siegel
Mollicone et al v. Universal Handicraft, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02450
Plaintiff: Lisa Mollicone and Millie Land
Defendant: Universal Handicraft, Inc. and Shay Sabag Segev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shai Alkebu-Lan v. A. Hatton, et al
as 17-56792
Petitioner - Appellant: SHAI ALKEBU-LAN, AKA Shai Alkebulan
Respondent - Appellee: A. HATTON, A Warden, BPH, PETER LABAHN and J. ANDRES
Leopona, Inc. et al v. UK Cycling Events, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01765
Plaintiff: Leopona, Inc. , Don't Be A Lout Music, LLC , Lionheart Media, LLC and others
Defendant: UK Cycling Events, Ltd. , Gareth Roelofse and Jon Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
In re: Hoyt Shay Neal, Esq. v. n
as 17-80144
Respondent: In re: HOYT SHAY NEAL, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 28, 2013
In re: Hoyt Neal
as 17-80143
Respondent: In re: HOYT SHAY NEAL, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit June 28, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?