Cases 81 - 90 of 104
CVN-WTP, LLC et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 2:2012cv04100
Counter Defendant:
CVN-WTP, LLC, Ronald Hirschman, Clifford M. Reston and others
Plaintiff:
CVN-WTP, LLC, Ronald Hirschman, Clifford M. Reston and others
Defendant:
Does and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Counter Claimant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Sherwin Williams Company v. Earl Scheib Inc
as 2:2012cv02963
Defendant:
Earl Scheib Inc
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Williams Company
Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Maxim l Properties
Defendant:
A.M. Bud Krohn, Ultra-Chem International, Inc, Moyer Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Marquez v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 4:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Shelia Marquez
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRSI Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 2:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
CRSI Incorporated
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Earl Scheib of California, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02870
Defendant:
Earl Scheib of California, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Villlage At Redondo Homeowners Association v. Sang Soo Kim et al
as 2:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Villlage At Redondo Homeowners Association
Defendant:
Sang Soo Kim, Chong Im Kim, Bank of America NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. WC Auto Body of South Gate, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv08323
Defendant:
Juan Gabriel Lopez, Ruben Ramirez, Bogar Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Comfortex Corporation v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 2:2010cv01861
Plaintiff:
Comfortex Corporation
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at00982
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
