Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Vitasek #269436 v. GEO Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Arthur L Vitasek
Defendant:
GEO Incorporated, CCHP, Unknown Armenta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ash v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ash
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Seth Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Cameron Arthur
Defendant:
Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ochoa #155345 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Ochoa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Perea, Unkown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. SWCA Incorporated
as 2:2023cv00660
Defendant:
SWCA Incorporated and SWCA Environmental Consultants
Plaintiff:
Arthur Cook, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Attakai v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2023cv08057
Plaintiff:
Arthur Attakai, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Schluter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Joel Arthur Schluter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hoffman
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur S Hoffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
