Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Pena, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3618
Petitioner:
OSMAN FELICIANO PENA, OSMAN PENA-ZEPEDA, HERMINIA NATALY ZEPEDA-PEREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez Olivares, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3574
Petitioner:
KENER GUSTAVO MARTINEZ OLIVARES, MARI JOSE MARTINEZ ZEPEDA, NIKOL MONSERRATH MARTINEZ ZEPEDA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(SS) Zepeda v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Santiago Garcia Zepeda
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Armida De Castro Henriquez v. Myrna Castro O'Bara et al
as 2:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
ARMIDA DE CASTRO HENRIQUEZ
Defendant:
MYRNA CASTRO O'BARA, JOHN O'BARA, 1013 INVESTMENTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Espinoza v. Zepeda et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Espinoza
Defendant:
V. Zepeda, Dr. Edwin Gomer and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irivne Promenade Apts IV LLC v. Skyler Gist et al
as 8:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Irivne Promenade Apts IV LLC
Defendant:
Skyler Gist, Neville Zepeda and Does 1 to 5
The Arden, LLC v. Ryan L. Stewart Boglin et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
The Arden, LLC
Defendant:
Ryan L. Stewart Boglin, Penelope Hill, Neville Zepeda and others
Sultana Ailena Vargas Bey v. San Bernardino County et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sultana Ailena Vargas Bey
Defendant:
San Bernardino County, Luther Snoke, Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
