Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gwen #332970 v. Yavapai County Superior Court et al
as 3:2026cv08126
Plaintiff:
Gerald Vaughn Gwen
Defendant:
Yavapai County Superior Court, Arizona, State of and Michael R Bluff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kovalck et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04521
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kovalck, Jr, Tammy Reed-Hopkins, Brendan Breen and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VAUGHN v. Pasadena Police Department
as 2:2026cv05042
Plaintiff:
JEROME VAUGHN
Defendant:
Pasadena Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Mitchell-Harlee et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04141
Plaintiff:
Andra Mitchell-Harlee, Junior Lafortune, Erica Hunter and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marshall-Reeves et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03962
Plaintiff:
Karen Marshall-Reeves, Dallas Arnett, Jr, Paula Trigg and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berentis et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03599
Plaintiff:
Jayson Berentis, Anthony Palmieri, Armando Candelario and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Villareal Sr et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03625
Plaintiff:
James Villareal Sr, Jacob Horn, William Reese and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cathay Bank v. Guimont et al
as 2:2026cv01369
Plaintiff:
Cathay Bank
Defendant:
Dan Guimont, Tom Vaughn, Andrew Pickering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
