Cases 1 - 10 of 562
Enriquez v. Garland
as 24-3381
Petitioner:
PEDRO QUINTERO ENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quintero v. Garland
as 24-3209
Petitioner:
YAJAIRA MARGELIA QUINTERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lee Michael Thompson v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oscar Quintero Jimenez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
Oscar Quintero Jimenez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Quinteros-Lainez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2706
Petitioner:
MARIA DOLORES QUINTEROS-LAINEZ and MELVIN ESTIBEN MERCADO-QUINTEROS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bridget Sibyl Quintero v. Prime Now LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Bridget Sibyl Quintero
Defendant:
Prime Now LLC, Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Eyad Karzoun v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Eyad Karzoun
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Trotter #362064 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Trotter
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Maria M Carkuff, D W Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
