Cases 1 - 10 of 833
Velasquez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Yvonne Velasquez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Quintanilla Velasquez v. Garland
as 24-2804
Petitioner:
LILIANA LOURDES QUINTANILLA VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Velasquez Velasquez v. Garland
as 24-2608
Petitioner:
RODOLFO VELASQUEZ VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasquez v. O'Malley
as 24-2589
Plaintiff:
MELONY DAWN VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
David Maillet v. Malgren Trucking, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
David Maillet
Defendant:
Malmgren Trucking Inc., Paul Velasquez and Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
David Maillet v. Malgren Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
David Maillet
Defendant:
Malmgren Trucking Inc., Paul Velasquez and Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
De Leon Velasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1925
Petitioner:
ESPERANZA DE LEON VELASQUEZ and MILEYDI RODAS DE LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
