Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01232
Plaintiff: Carl Anthony Frink, Danny L. Jordan, Debra J. Holcomb and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert W. Neal v. Dean Borders et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00126
Plaintiff: Robert W. Neal
Respondent: California Institution For Men
Defendant: J Shepard and Dean Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Neal v. Borders et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03208
Plaintiff: Robert W. Neal
Defendant: Dean Borders, California Institution for Men and J. Shepard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01259
Plaintiff: Robert W. Neal
Defendant: State of California , Anthony Rendon, Kevin de Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-17178
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-16423
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-16240
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-16238
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Neal v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01162
Plaintiff: Ray W Neal
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Neal v. Warden, et al
as 17-15276
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, SATF, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY OF CDCR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?