Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jorge Anderson-El, et al v. Michael Zeff, et al
as 19-56321
Defendant / Appellee:
STANLEY MIDDLEMAN, Individual, DBA Freedom Mortgage, GRAHAM HOLMES, Individual, DBA Reviron Realty, BRADLEY OLPIN SNELL, Individual, DBA Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
KING ABDUL MUMIN-EL and JOYCE TRUMPET
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANDERSON-EL
Jorge Anderson-El et al v. Michael D Zeff et al
as 5:2019cv01777
Plaintiff:
King Abdul Mumin-El, Jorge Anderson-El and Joyce Trumpet
Defendant:
Jeff Tcharavov, Stanley Middleman, Bradley Olpin Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Pigott v. Barr et al
as 2:2019cv01489
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley Pigott and King Abdul Mumin El
Defendant:
Kristin Richardson, David P Tracy, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barr v. Pigott
as 2:2019cv00682
Respondent:
Joseph Stanley Pigott and King Abdul Mumin El
Petitioner:
Heather Winslow Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mumin Abass v. Sally Q. Yate
as 16-74045
Petitioner:
MUMIN ABASS
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02116
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phyliss Murphy et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08286
Plaintiff:
Connie Andringa, Jacquelyn Barnes-Buttrum, Chanessa Bowyer and others
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Phyliss Murphy et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Connie Andringa, Jacquelyn Barnes-Buttrum, Chanessa Bowyer and others
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
