Cases 1 - 10 of 7,780
Smith v. Rack Room Shoes, Inc.
as 3:2024cv06709
Defendant:
Rack Room Shoes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06681
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. Axos Financial, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
Axos Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Doljanin v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
John-Thomas Doljanin
Defendant:
William Berkely, Rodney Bruce, Beth Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
A.L. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv06580
Plaintiff:
A.L.
Defendant:
United States of America, Darrell Wayne Smith and Ray J. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redeaux v. TVC Funding IV REO, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv06560
Defendant:
Judge Elizabeth Riles, Clerk's Department, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, TVC Funding IV REO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Redeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Food For Less Store Manager and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ayodele
as 1:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Seyi Ayodele
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashley Smith v. Jake Belabin Chiropractic Inc.
as 2:2024cv07883
Defendant:
Jake Belabin Chiropractic Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Elemental Wellness South Bay
Plaintiff:
Ashley Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
