Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Centeno-Sarabia #267426 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Jorge C Centeno-Sarabia
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sarabia et al v. Yuma Regional Medical Center et al
as 2:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Juanita Sarabia and Megan Kircher
Defendant:
Yuma Regional Medical Center and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Yuma Regional Medical Center
as 2:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Brittney Johnson
Defendant:
Yuma Regional Medical Center
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Juanita Sarabia, Megan Kircher, Brian Kircher and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Petitioner:
Steven Sentre Merchant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Stewart v. Allen et al
as 3:2021cv08250
Plaintiff:
Jenghiz K Stewart
Defendant:
Unknown Allen, Unknown Carlisle, Corrections Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sarabia et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Sergio Sarabia and Maria Sarabia
Defendant:
Soontaya Cahill, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Felix v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Sarabia Felix
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarabia-Felix v. USA
as 2:2016cv04212
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Sarabia Felix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sarabia-Labrador v. USA
as 2:2013cv02193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Felipe Sarabia-Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sarabia-Nava v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02172
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Sarabia-Nava
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
