Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adams v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07741
Plaintiff:
Alexander Adams
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parsons v. San Jose Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04691
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department, Santa Clara County, William Todd Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Alexander Adam King
Defendant:
Hendricks, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adame v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01769
Plaintiff:
Alexander Adame
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial, LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Robinhood Securities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Robinhood Outage Litigation
as 3:2020cv01626
Plaintiff:
Daniel Beckman, Joseph Gwaltney, Jared Leith and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial, LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Robinhood Securities, LLC
Interested Party:
Alexander Adame, Colin Prendergast, Jason Steinberg and others
Claimant:
Mohammed Ali Abdul Kader
Not Classified By Court:
Ally Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02951
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Ozwear Connection Pty Ltd. et al
as 5:2015mc80083
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
Ozwear Connection Pty Ltd. and Alexander Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Ozwear Connection Pty Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv02307
Defendant:
Alexander Adams, Does and Ozwear Connection Pty Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
United States of America v. Alexander Adam
as 2:2010cv02758
Respondent:
Alexander Adam
Petitioner:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
