Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Roessler v. Universal City Studios, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02080
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., AMC Entertainment, Inc., Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Roessler
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02233
Plaintiff:
Pacific Court - Pine Square Partners
Defendant:
American Multi-Cinema, Inc, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, AMC Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrie Couser v. AMC Entertainment Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00284
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Carrie Couser
USA v. AMC Ent Inc, et al
as 2:1999cv01034
Counter Claimant:
AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema, Inc and Salts, Troutman & Kaneshiro Inc
Counter Defendant:
AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema Inc, United States of America and others
Unknown:
Tasia Marie Scolinos and Dov Lutzker
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment, Inc, American Multi-Cinema, Inc and Salts, Troutman & Kaneshiro Inc
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA, et al v. AMC Entertainment, et al
as 06-55390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC. and AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THEATRE OWNERS INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
