Cases 1 - 10 of 10
YELLOWCAKE, INC. et al v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022at00671
Plaintiff:
YELLOWCAKE, INC. and LATIN POWER MUSIC USA, LLC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., UNIVERSAL MUSIC LATIN ENTERTAINMENT, DISA LATIN MUSIC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Yellowcake, Inc. et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Yellowcake, Inc. and Latin Power Music USA, LLC
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc., Universal Music Latin Entertainment, Disa Latin Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Valle v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2020cv02319
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Antonio Silva Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nesme v. Koenig
as 3:2019cv06140
Petitioner:
Antonio Silva Nesme
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Antonio Nesme v. Craig Koenig
as 19-71592
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SILVA NESME
Respondent:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
USA v. Reynaldo Lopez-Pacheco
as 12-50562
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REYNALDO LOPEZ-PACHECO, AKA Filo Antonio, AKA Reynaldo Lopez Antonio, AKA Reynaldo Antonio Lopez, AKA Pedro Antonio Silva, AKA Jose Silvia, AKA Pedro Torres
Antonio Silva v. T. Schwartz, et al
as 12-55943
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO SILVA
Respondent - Appellee:
T. SCHWARTZ, CDCR Director and F. GONZALEZ
Ramon et al v. Moore
as 5:2011cv05829
Plaintiff:
Jose Hildago Ramon , Roberto De La Cruz , Rufino Melendez and others
Defendant:
Donna Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Antonio Silva v. T Schwartz et al
as 2:2011cv07464
Respondent:
F Gonzalez and T Schwartz
Petitioner:
Antonio Silva
USA v. Antonio Silva-Quiroz
as 09-10355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO SILVA-QUIROZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
