Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02959
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Vaughn Johnson v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73066
Petitioner:
VAUGHN JOHNSON, AKA Juan Antonio Johnson, AKA Casey Oliver Joseph, AKA Juan Antonio Smith
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Vaughn Johnson v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71005
Petitioner:
VAUGHN JOHNSON, AKA Juan Antonio Johnson, AKA Casey Oliver Joseph, AKA Juan Antonio Smith
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00529
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Smith-Encinas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73193
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SMITH-ENCINAS, AKA Marco Antonio Encinas, AKA Marco Mendoza, AKA Marco Anthony Mendoza, AKA Marco Smith, AKA Marco A. Smith, Marco Anthony Smith, AKA Marco Antonio Smith, AKA Marcos Antonio Smith
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Smith v. Martell
as 2:2011cv01522
Petitioner:
Antonio Smith
Respondent:
M. Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Merced County
as 1:2010cv01885
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Merced County
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75
Riches v. Leinart et al
as 2:2008cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Matt Leinart, Edgerrin James, Larry Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
