Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Rod Anthony Huff et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv07750
Plaintiff:
Rod Anthony Huff and Rod A. Huff Jr. LLC doing business as Amora Tribe (Entity No. 104-202358610802)
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and George Gascon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. City of Beverly Hills
as 24-4138
Respondent:
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC et al v. Beverly Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv04539
Respondent:
Beverly Hills Police Department, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, People of The State of California and others
Petitioner:
Rod Anthony Huff, Jr. and Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huff v. Los Angeles County Superior Court
as 24-2824
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Huff-McKay v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Huff-McKay
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Phan Khanh and Khanh Phan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huff v. People of the State of California
as 24-641
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rod Huff v. People of the State of California
as 22-70059
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rod Anthony Huff v. Surety Bond 2005341594
as 2:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Rod Anthony Huff
Defendant:
Surety Bond 2005341594
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rod Anthony Huff v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Rod Anthony Huff
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rod Anthony Huff v. Richard Owen Kaye et al
as 2:2021cv07686
Plaintiff:
Rod Anthony Huff
Defendant:
Richard Owen Kaye, County of Los Angeles, County of San Bernardino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
