Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Georgian Beebe et al v. Callahan Auto Supply, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01253
Plaintiff:
Georgianne Beebe
Defendant:
Darlene Baier, DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, A. Callahan Auto Supply, Inc. DBA Napa Auto Parts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SETNIK v. FINAN'S AUTO SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv01506
Defendant:
FINAN'S AUTO SUPPLY, INC., Foster Wheeler LLC, Folsom Auto Supply and others
Plaintiff:
SETNIK ROBERT and Robert Setnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv05107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Daniel Lopez v. Susan Harriet Nassif et al
as 5:2018cv00812
Defendant:
Does, High Desert Auto Supply, Inc. and Susan Harriet Nassif
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lopez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Genuine Parts Company v. Arleta Auto Supply Inc et al
as 2:2012mc00183
Defendant:
Arleta Auto Supply Inc, Maritza Martinez and Marvin Martinez
Plaintiff:
Genuine Parts Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2009ml02007
Plaintiff:
Flash Sales, Inc., Harold's Autobody, Motoring Parts International and others
Defendant:
Depo Auto Parts Ind Co Ltd, Sabry Lee Limited, Genera Corporation and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Travis Burau, Trang Nguyen, National Auto Parts, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Westminster Mutual Insurance Company
In Re:
Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antiitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
